Radiology · 1997 · 24 citations · 15 references
EngineeringPhysicsFlow VisualizationFluid DynamicsUltrasonographyFlow MeasurementFlow MetrologyBlood Flow MeasurementCarotid Artery UltrasonographyCarotid Artery UltrasoundFlow Velocity MeasurementsFlow-volume CurvesReference Standard ComparisonTransit-time Flow MeasurementVascular Flow Imaging
PURPOSE: To evaluate carotid artery volume-flow measurements with time-domain-processing ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volume-flow measurements were obtained in the carotid arteries of nine swine with time-domain-processing US. Four swine were prepared with a model of an arteriovenous shunt. Flow through the carotid artery was varied by means of a number of physiologic and pharmacologic interventions. The reference standard for volume flow consisted of measurements with transit-time US flowmetry. At a limited number of measurement points, this reference standard was validated against true volume flow measured with timed collection. RESULTS: For flow rates less than 500 mL/min, a linear correlation existed between measurements with time-domain processing and the US flow meter (r2 = .96, P < .001, slope = 1.117). Values above 500 mL/min were less well correlated with the reference standard. True flow was underestimated with both methods, less so with time-domain processing than with US flowmetry (underestimation, 10% versus 21%). Measurements were significantly less reproducible with time-domain processing than with US flowmetry (P < .001). Interobserver variability was negligible. CONCLUSION: Because of operator errors, measurements with time-domain processing should be repeated at least three times to ensure accuracy and may be inaccurate in flow rates over 500 mL/min.
15
Relationship between Brain Blood Flow and Carotid Arterial Flow in the Sheep Fetus
Frank van Bel, Christine Roman, Robert J Klautz et al. · Pediatric Research · 1994 · 110 citations
Medicine, Neurobiology, Neuroscience +16