SSRN Electronic Journal · 2001 · 36 citations · 5 references
BusinessFinanceRisk ManagementFinancial Risk ManagementRisk AnalysisRisk AssessmentBank Risk ManagementBank Stress TestingFinancial RiskOperational RiskOperational Risk RegulationRisk EvaluationExtreme Value AnalysisOperational Risk Capital ModelingOperational Risk Management FrameworkProcess RiskProcess Risk AssessmentRegulatory Capital Frameworks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision introduced a regulatory capital charge for operational risk, sparking ongoing debates due to the complexity of defining the concept. The study demonstrates that operational risk can be unambiguously defined and modeled for a bank production unit with well‑defined workflow processes and a comprehensive self‑assessment based on six risk factors. The authors use extreme value theory to calculate risk measures for independent and dependent risk factors in the defined production unit. The analysis reveals that frequency dependence has minimal impact, severity dependence markedly shifts results, fraud dominates other factors, and only 10 % of processes account for 98 % of VaR, a finding of major practical relevance given the high cost of process definition and maintenance, with sensitivity analysis confirming the robustness of this key subset under stress testing.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision ("the Committee") released a consultative document that included a regulatory capital charge for operational risk. The complexity of the object "operational risk" led from the time of the document's release to vigorous and recurring discussions. We show that for a production unit of a bank with well-defined workflow processes where a comprehensive self-assessment based on six risk factors has been carried out, operational risk can be unambiguously defined and modelled. Using techniques from extreme value theory, we calculate risk measures for independent and dependent risk factors, re-spectively. The results of this modelling exercise are relevant for the implementation of a risk management framework: Frequency dependence among the risk factors only slightly changes the independency results, severity dependence on the contrary changes the independency results significantly, the risk factor "fraud" dominates all other factors and finally, only 10 percent of all processes have a 98 percent contribution to the resulting VaR. Since the definition and maintenance of processes is very costly, this last results is of major practical relevance. Performing a sensitivity analysis, it turns out that the key 10% of relevant processes is rather robust under this stress testing.
5
Matthew Rabin · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · 1997 · 2.4K citations · Full text
An Academic Response to Basel II
Con Keating, Hyun Song Shin, Charles Goodhart et al. · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2001 · 291 citations
Law, Economics, Regulatory Policy +14
Extremes and integrated risk management
Paul Embrechts · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 2000 · 194 citations