1987 · 59 citations · 16 references
ComputingComputer ScienceLinguisticsComputational LinguisticsNatural Language ProcessingSyntaxGrammarLanguage ModelingLanguage ModelsParsingSyntactic AnalysisSyntax AnalysisError TaggingFirst-order Markov ModelsGrammatical Error AnalysisLanguage ParsingLanguage SyntaxNatural Language InferenceSyntactic Error AnalysisSyntactic Error Detection
The Constituent Likelihood Automatic Word-tagging System (CLAWS) was originally designed for the low-level grammatical analysis of the million-word LOB Corpus of English text samples. CLAWS does not attempt a full parse, but uses a first-order Markov model of language to assign word-class labels to words. CLAWS can be modified to detect grammatical errors, essentially by flagging unlikely word-class transitions in the input text. This may seem to be an intuitively implausible and theoretically inadequate model of natural language syntax, but nevertheless it can successfully pinpoint most grammatical errors in a text. Several modifications to CLAWS have been explored. The resulting system cannot detect all errors in typed documents; but then neither do far more complex systems, which attempt a full parse, requiring much greater computation.
16
The American Heritage Word Frequency Book
Robert E. Warren, J. B. Carroll, Paul S. Davies et al. · The American Journal of Psychology · 1973 · 1.4K citations
The EPISTLE text-critiquing system
George E. Heidorn, Karen Jensen, Lance A. Miller et al. · IBM Systems Journal · 1982 · 142 citations
Recovery Strategies for Parsing Extragrammatical Language
Jaime Carbonell, Philip J. Hayes · Figshare · 2018 · 135 citations · Full text
Meta-rules as a basis for processing ill-formed input
Ralph Weischedel, Norman K. Sondheimer · 1983 · 103 citations