The Risk Factors Prevention Paradigm and the Causes of Youth Crime: A Deceptively Useful Analysis?

Abstract

The risk factors prevention paradigm (RFPP) is currently the dominant discourse in juvenile justice, exerting a powerful influence over policy and practice in the UK, Ireland and other countries. This article argues that the predominance of the RFPP is in many ways an obstacle to a fuller understanding of, and more effective response to, youth crime. Part of the problem is the often over-simplified assumptions and exaggerated claims of the RFPP literature, which translates the findings of risk-focused research for policy makers and for popular consumption, but largely ignores the caveats of the scientific researchers themselves. Moreover, the RFPP has intrinsic, but generally neglected, methodological and theoretical shortcomings, which mean that it fails to account properly for key facets of youth justice, such as personal agency, socio-cultural context, psychological motivation and the human rights dimension.