Extensions of the Lewis system S5

Schiller Joe Scroggs

Journal of Symbolic Logic · 1951 · 105 citations · 4 references

Concepts

Abstract

Dugundji has proved that none of the Lewis systems of modal logic, S 1 through S 5, has a finite characteristic matrix. The question arises whether there exist proper extensions of S 5 which have no finite characteristic matrix. By an extension of a sentential calculus S , we usually refer to any system S ′ such that every formula provable in S is provable in S ′. An extension S ′ of S is called proper if it is not identical with S . The answer to the question is trivially affirmative in case we make no additional restrictions on the class of extensions. Thus the extension of S5 obtained by adding to the provable formulas the additional formula p has no finite characteristic matrix (indeed, it has no characteristic matrix at all), but this extension is not closed under substitution—the formula q is not provable in it. McKinsey and Tarski have defined normal extensions of S 4* by imposing three conditions. Normal extensions must be closed under substitution, must preserve the rule of detachment under material implication, and must also preserve the rule that if α is provable then ~◊~ α is provable. McKinsey and Tarski also gave an example of an extension of S 4 which satisfies the first two of these conditions but not the third. One of the results of this paper is that every extension of S 5 which satisfies the first two of these conditions also satisfies the third, and hence the above definition of normal extension is redundant for S 5. We shall therefore limit the extensions discussed in this paper to those which are closed under substitution and which preserve the rule of detachment under material implication. These extensions we shall call quasi-normal. The class of quasi-normal extensions of S 5 is a very broad class and actually includes all extensions which are likely to prove interesting. It is easily shown that quasi-normal extensions of S 5 preserve the rules of replacement, adjunction, and detachment under strict implication. It is the purpose of this paper to prove that every proper quasi-normal extension of S 5 has a finite characteristic matrix and that every quasi-normal extension of S 5 is a normal extension of S 5 and to describe a simple class of characteristic matrices for S 5.

References

4