1997 · 91 citations · 4 references
ArchitectureComputational EngineeringDesign OptimizationMutation BreedingOptimizationEvolutionary ComputationEvolutionary OptimizationGenetic AlgorithmsGenetic ProgrammingMetaheuristic OptimizationMutation OperatorsEvolutionary AlgorithmsExperimental Data CollectionGenetic Algorithm OptimizationGenetic Algorithm Parameter TuningGenetic Algorithms For SearchGenetic Programming CrossoverGenetic Programming MutationRelative Effectiveness Estimation
In [Luke and Spector 1997] we presented a comprehensive suite of data comparing GP crossover and point mutation over four domains and a wide range of parameter settings. Unfortunately, the results were marred by statistical flaws. This revision of the study eliminates these flaws, with three times as much the data as the original experiments had. Our results again show that crossover does have some advantage over mutation given the right parameter settings (primarily larger population sizes), though the difference between the two surprisingly small. Further, the results are complex, suggesting that the big picture is more complicated than is commonly believed. 1
4
On Crossover as an Evolutionarily Viable Strategy.
J. David Schaffer, Larry J. Eshelman · ICGA · 1991 · 94 citations