Guillotine versus dissection tonsillectomy: randomised, controlled trial

Steven J. Frampton, Matthew J. Ward, Vishnu Sunkaraneni, Hasnaa Ismail-Koch, Zoë A Sheppard, Rami J. Salib, P K Jain

The Journal of Laryngology & Otology · 2012 · 10 citations · 11 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This trial aimed to compare the guillotine technique of tonsillectomy with 'cold steel' dissection, the current 'gold standard'. DESIGN: A single centre, randomised, controlled trial. METHODS: One hundred children aged 3 to 11 years who were listed for bilateral tonsillectomy were recruited. Patients had one tonsil removed by each technique, and were blinded to the side. The operative time, intra-operative blood loss, haemostasis requirement and post-operative pain scores were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Operative time and intra-operative blood loss were both significantly less for the guillotine technique (p < 0.001) and there was a significantly reduced haemostasis requirement (p < 0.001). Pain was also less on the guillotine side (p < 0.001). There were no tonsillar remnants or palatal trauma for either technique. There was no significant difference between techniques in the frequency of secondary haemorrhage. CONCLUSION: This study provides level Ib evidence that guillotine tonsillectomy in children with mobile tonsils is an effective and time-efficient procedure which produces less intra-operative blood loss and post-operative pain than cold steel dissection.

References

11