Soil Property Criteria for Rammed Earth Stabilization

Steve Burroughs

Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2008 · 144 citations · 17 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study links ranges of soil plasticity, texture, and shrinkage to how likely soils are to stabilize for rammed earth walls. The authors performed 219 strength tests on 104 compacted soils treated with cement, lime, or asphalt, and related soil property ranges to the proportion achieving a 2 MPa compressive strength threshold. Linear shrinkage and plasticity index best predict stabilization success, with soils having LS < 6 % and PI < 15 % or LS 6–11 % and PI 15–30 % plus sand < 64 % achieving ≥80 % success using ~4 % cement and 2 % lime, while soils with higher LS, PI, or sand content perform poorly, enabling engineers to choose suitable soils and reduce trial costs.

Abstract

This study relates value ranges of natural soil properties (plasticity, texture, and shrinkage) to the degree of predisposition of soils to stabilization for rammed earth wall construction. A total of 219 strength determinations were made on 104 soils compacted and stabilized with cement and/or lime and/or asphalt. Using a 2MPa compressive strength criterion as the measure of stabilization success, soil property value ranges were related to the proportion of samples exceeding the criterion. Linear shrinkage (LS) and plasticity index (PI) are found to be the best discriminators of soil predisposition, with textural variables being useful secondary discriminators. "Favorable" soils, with stabilization success rates of ≥80%, include those with: (1) LS<6.0% and PI<15%; and (2) LS 6.0–11.0%, PI 15–30%, and sand content <64%. These soils were stabilized with treatments averaging 4.2% cement and 1.8% lime, with individual treatments ranging from 4–8% total cement and/or lime. "Unfavorable" soils, with stabilization success rates of <60%, include those with LS 6.0–11.0, PI 15–30, and sand content ≥64%, or with LS>11.0, PI>30. These findings should assist rammed earth engineers to more easily select a suitable soil and to minimize resources spent on preconstruction stabilization trials.

References

17