Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2015 · 544 citations · 48 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyCancer PharmacologyMolecular OncologyOncology PharmacotherapyCombination Cancer TherapyHedgehog SignalingMetastatic Disease TreatmentPancreatic CancerPharmacodynamics Of Anticancer AgentsPharmacodynamics Of Anticancer DrugsCanonical Hedgehog SignalingGemcitabine-based TherapyHedgehog Pathway InhibitorsHedgehog Signaling InhibitionPancreatic Cancer Hedgehog SignalingPancreatic Cancer PharmacotherapyPharmacological Targeting Of Hedgehog SignalingPhase Ii Investigation
PURPOSE: Sonic hedgehog (SHH), an activating ligand of smoothened (SMO), is overexpressed in > 70% of pancreatic cancers (PCs). We investigated the impact of vismodegib, an SHH antagonist, plus gemcitabine (GV) or gemcitabine plus placebo (GP) in a multicenter phase Ib/randomized phase II trial and preclinical PC models. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with PC not amenable to curative therapy who had received no prior therapy for metastatic disease and had Karnofsky performance score ≥ 80 were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to GV or GP. The primary end point was progression-free-survival (PFS). Exploratory correlative studies included serial SHH serum levels and contrast perfusion computed tomography imaging. To further investigate putative biologic mechanisms of SMO inhibition, two autochthonous pancreatic cancer models (Kras(G12D); p16/p19(fl/fl); Pdx1-Cre and Kras(G12D); p53(R270H/wt); Pdx1-Cre) were studied. RESULTS: No safety issues were identified in the phase Ib portion (n = 7), and the phase II study enrolled 106 evaluable patients (n = 53 in each arm). Median PFS was 4.0 and 2.5 months for GV and GP arms, respectively (95% CI, 2.5 to 5.3 and 1.9 to 3.8, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.21; P = .30). Median overall survival (OS) was 6.9 and 6.1 months for GV and GP arms, respectively (95% CI, 5.8 to 8.0 and 5.0 to 8.0, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.58; P = .84). Response rates were not significantly different. There were no significant associations between correlative markers and overall response rate, PFS, or OS. Preclinical trials revealed no significant differences with vismodegib in drug delivery, tumor growth rate, or OS in either model. CONCLUSION: The addition of vismodegib to gemcitabine in an unselected cohort did not improve overall response rate, PFS, or OS in patients with metastatic PC. Our preclinical and clinical results revealed no statistically significant differences with respect to drug delivery or treatment efficacy using vismodegib.
48
Rebecca L. Siegel, Deepa Naishadham, Ahmedin Jemal · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2013 · 11.9K citations · Full text
FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Thierry Conroy, Françoise Desseigne, Marc Ychou et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 7.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +13
Increased Survival in Pancreatic Cancer with nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine
Daniel D. Von Hoff, Thomas J. Ervin, Francis P. Arena et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 6.7K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +13
Howard A. Burris, Malcolm J. Moore, John Sahl Andersen et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 1997 · 5.9K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +16
Malcolm J. Moore, David Goldstein, John Hamm et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2007 · 3.9K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17