2006 · 40 citations · 4 references
ComputingComputer ScienceModel-based Systems EngineeringProgramming LanguagesSystems ModelingModel IntegrationModel TransformationModel-driven Software EngineeringRule-based RepresentationSoftware ArchitectureSoftware ModelingDeclarative TransformationEvaluationModel Transformation LanguagesModel Transformation ReuseModel Transformation RulesRule ModularizationRule-based TransformationTransformation Languages
This paper studies ways for modularizing transformation definitions in current rule-based model transformation languages. Two scenarios are shown in which the modular units are identified on the base of the relations between source and target metamodels and on the base of generic transformation functionality. Both scenarios justify modularization by requiring adaptability and reusability in transformation definitions. To enable representation and composition of the identified units, a transformation language must provide proper modular constructs and mechanisms for their integration. We evaluate several implementations of the scenarios by applying different transformation techniques: usage of explicit and implicit rule calls, and usage of rule inheritance. ATLAS Transformation Language (ATL) is used to illustrate these implementations. The experience with these scenarios shows that current languages provide a reasonably full set of modular constructs but may have problems in handling some composition tasks.
4
<i>N</i> degrees of separation
Peri Tarr, Harold Ossher, William Harrison et al. · 1999 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Classification of Model Transformation Approaches
Krzysztof Czarnecki, Simon Helsen · 2003 · 703 citations
N degrees of separation: multi-dimensional separation of concerns
Peri Tarr, Harold Ossher, William Harrison et al. · 2003 · 154 citations