The Journal of Economic History · 1987 · 297 citations · 16 references
Social SciencesEconomicsHistoryInternational EconomicsLabor EconomicsLabor HistoryIndustrial LocationIndustrial PolicyIndustrializationLaborTextile HistoryCotton EconomyCotton HistoryCotton Plantation EconomyEconomic Growth HistoryIndustrial Labor MigrationIndustrial Textile ProductionInternational Labor MigrationTextile Mills
In 1910, a single New England cotton textile worker performed as much work as 1.5 British, 2.3 German, and nearly 6 Greek, Japanese, Indian, or Chinese workers, highlighting stark productivity disparities. The study finds that differences in local culture, rather than input substitution or technology, drive worker performance, explaining international wage variation and influencing labor migration, technology choice, and economic growth.
In 1910 one New England cotton textile operative performed as much work as 1.5 British, 2.3 German, and nearly 6 Greek, Japanese, Indian, or Chinese workers. Input substitution, and differences in technology, management, and workers' training or inherent abilities do not explain this. Instead local culture seems to have determined worker performance. Such differences, if widespread, would explain much of the international variation in wages. They also have important consequences for understanding labor migration, the choice of technique, and the sources of economic growth.
16
Why Isn't the Whole World Developed?
Richard A. Easterlin · The Journal of Economic History · 1981 · 628 citations
Humanities, Economics, History +9
W. T. Easterbrook · The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science · 1963 · 131 citations
Humanities, Economics, History +14