Publication | Closed Access
Physiological and Performance Effects of Generic versus Specific Aerobic Training in Soccer Players
645
Citations
30
References
2006
Year
Physical ActivityAerobic ExerciseEducationStrength TrainingMatch PerformanceKinesiologySoccer MatchesExercisePhysical ExerciseApplied PhysiologyPerformance EffectsSport PhysiologySport ScienceHealth SciencesPhysical FitnessSoccer PlayersAerobic Interval TrainingExercise ScienceHigh-performance SportPhysiologyExercise PhysiologyAthletic Training
The study compared specific small‑sided games versus generic running interval training on fitness and match performance in junior soccer players. Forty junior players were randomized to 20 per group and performed twice‑weekly 4×4‑minute intervals at 90–95 % HRmax with 3‑minute active rest, while VO₂max, lactate threshold, running economy, Ekblom’s circuit, and match‑performance metrics were measured at baseline, after 4 weeks pre‑season, and after 8 weeks regular season, with similar training loads across groups. Both training modes improved aerobic fitness and match performance, especially during the first 4 weeks, but no significant differences were found between specific and generic interval training, showing they are equally effective.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of specific (small-sided games) vs. generic (running) aerobic interval training on physical fitness and objective measures of match performance in soccer. Forty junior players were randomly assigned to either generic (n=20) or specific (n=20) interval training consisting of 4 bouts of 4 min at 90-95 % of maximum heart rate with 3 min active rest periods, completed twice a week. The following outcomes were measured at baseline (Pre), after 4 weeks of pre-season training (Mid), and after a further 8 weeks of training during the regular season (Post): maximum oxygen uptake, lactate threshold (Tlac), running economy at Tlac, a soccer-specific endurance test (Ekblom's circuit), and indices of physical performance during soccer matches (total distance and time spent standing, walking, and at low- and high-intensity running speed). Training load, as quantified by heart rate and rating of perceived exertion, was recorded during all training sessions and was similar between groups. There were significant improvements in aerobic fitness and match performance in both groups of soccer players, especially in response to the first 4 weeks of pre-season training. However, no significant differences between specific and generic aerobic interval training were found in any of the measured variables including soccer specific tests. The results of this study showed that both small-sided games and running are equally effective modes of aerobic interval training in junior soccer players.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1