Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2008 · 680 citations · 42 references
EngineeringMachine LearningStructural Pattern RecognitionText MiningStatistical Relational LearningData ScienceData MiningObserved DataStructure DeterminationStructure ElucidationStructural FormHierarchical ClassificationGraph GrammarsKnowledge DiscoveryComputer ScienceCrystallographyStructural BiologyPattern FormationGraph TheoryStructure DiscoveryStructure MiningPeriodic StructureForm FindingMedicine
Algorithms for finding structure in data are increasingly important but are limited to a single pre‑specified form, whereas scientists and children discover diverse structural forms such as hierarchies, periodicity, and transitive relations. The authors present a computational model that learns structures of many different forms and identifies the best form for a given dataset. The model learns structures by making probabilistic inferences over a space of graph grammars representing trees, linear orders, multidimensional spaces, rings, dominance hierarchies, cliques, and other forms. The model successfully uncovers the underlying structure across physical, biological, and social domains, advancing structure learning toward human‑like cognitive abilities.
Algorithms for finding structure in data have become increasingly important both as tools for scientific data analysis and as models of human learning, yet they suffer from a critical limitation. Scientists discover qualitatively new forms of structure in observed data: For instance, Linnaeus recognized the hierarchical organization of biological species, and Mendeleev recognized the periodic structure of the chemical elements. Analogous insights play a pivotal role in cognitive development: Children discover that object category labels can be organized into hierarchies, friendship networks are organized into cliques, and comparative relations (e.g., "bigger than" or "better than") respect a transitive order. Standard algorithms, however, can only learn structures of a single form that must be specified in advance: For instance, algorithms for hierarchical clustering create tree structures, whereas algorithms for dimensionality-reduction create low-dimensional spaces. Here, we present a computational model that learns structures of many different forms and that discovers which form is best for a given dataset. The model makes probabilistic inferences over a space of graph grammars representing trees, linear orders, multidimensional spaces, rings, dominance hierarchies, cliques, and other forms and successfully discovers the underlying structure of a variety of physical, biological, and social domains. Our approach brings structure learning methods closer to human abilities and may lead to a deeper computational understanding of cognitive development.
42
<i>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</i>
Thomas Kühn, Richard Schlegel · Physics Today · 1963 · 35.5K citations
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees
John P. Huelsenbeck, Fredrik Ronquist · Bioinformatics · 2001 · 21.9K citations · Full text
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Marie Boas Hall, Thomas Kühn · The American Historical Review · 1963 · 7.6K citations