Publication | Closed Access
On the Maximum Likelihood Approach for Source and Network Localization
46
Citations
53
References
2011
Year
EngineeringMachine LearningLocation EstimationPositioning SystemNetwork AnalysisLocalization TechniqueLocalizationNetwork LocalizationData ScienceLocation AwarenessSpeaker LocalizationLocalization ProblemMaximum Likelihood ApproachInverse ProblemsComputer ScienceLocalization ProblemsRf LocalizationSignal ProcessingNetwork Science
We consider the source and network localization problems, seeking to strengthen the relationship between the Weighted-Least-Square (WLS) and the Maximum-Likelihood (ML) solutions of these problems. To this end, we design an optimization algorithm for source and network localization under the principle that: a) the WLS and the ML objectives should be the same; and b) the solution of the ML-WLS objective does not depend on any information besides the set of given distance measurements (observations). The proposed Range-Global Distance Continuation (R-GDC) algorithm solves the localization problems via iterative minimizations of smoothed variations of the WLS objective, each obtained by convolution with a Gaussian kernel of progressively smaller variances. Since the last (not smoothed) WLS objective derives directly from the ML formulation of the localization problem, and the R-GDC requires no initial estimate to minimize it, final result is maximum-likelihood approach to source and network localization problems. The performance of the R-GDC method is compared to that of state-of-the-art techniques such as semidefinite programming (SDP), nonlinear Newton least squares (NLS), and the Stress-of-a-MAjorizing-Complex-Objective-Function (SMACOF) algorithms, as well as to the Cramér-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB). The comparison reveals that the solutions obtained with the R-GDC algorithm is insensitive to initial estimates and provides a localization error that closely approaches that of the corresponding fundamental bounds. The R-GDC is also found to achieve a complexity order comparable to that of the SMACOF, which is known for its efficiency.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1