Oikos · 2001 · 60 citations · 51 references
Life SciencesBiologyEcologyMammalogyPopulation BiologyPopulation EcologyAnimal EcologyGrowth DynamicsMammalian EcologyMammalian Population BiologyPopulation DynamicsPopulation RegulationAutoregressive ModelsDelayed Density DependenceGrowth RatesLarge Mammal EcologyPopulation Growth RatesSmall Mammal EcologySmall Population DynamicsTrophic Population Interactions
We offer an evaluation of the Caughley and Krebs hypothesis that small mammals are more likely than large mammals to possess intrinsic population regulating mechanisms. Based on the assumption that intrinsic regulation will be manifest via direct density‐dependent feedbacks, and extrinsic regulation via delayed density‐dependent feedbacks, we fit autoregressive models to 30 time series of abundance for large and small mammals to characterize their dynamics. Delayed feedbacks characterizing extrinsic mechanisms, such as trophic‐level interactions, were detected in most time series, including both small and large mammals. Spectral analyses indicated that the effect of such delayed feedbacks on the variability in population growth rates differed with body size, with large mammals exhibiting predominantly reddened and whitened spectra in contrast with predominantly blue spectra for small mammals. Large mammals showed less variance and more stable dynamics than small mammals, consistent with, among other factors, differences in their potential population growth rates. Patterns of population dynamics in small versus large mammals contradicted those predicted by the Caughley and Krebs hypothesis.
51
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
HighWire Press · 1886 · 10K citations
Regression and time series model selection in small samples
Clifford M. Hurvich, Chih‐Ling Tsai · Biometrika · 1989 · 6.4K citations
The natural regulation of animal numbers
Journal of Human Evolution · 1972 · 3K citations
Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour