Journal of Radiation Research · 2013 · 26 citations · 27 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyClinical Radiation OncologyGenitourinary Radiation OncologyProstate DiseaseAndrogen Deprivation TherapyExternal Beam RadiotherapyGenitourinary Cancer RadiotherapyProstate CancerRadiation TherapyRadiation Therapy For Prostate DiseaseAndrogen Deprivation Therapy IntegrationExternal Beam Radiotherapy DosimetryHypofractionated Radiation TherapyMean Organ DoseNeoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation TherapyProstate Cancer Hormonal TherapyProstate Cancer Hormone TherapyProstate Cancer Radiotherapy
The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria-defined high-risk (HR) and very high-risk (VHR) prostate cancer. Data from 178 HR (n = 96, 54%) and VHR (n = 82, 46%) prostate cancer patients who underwent (192)Ir-HDR brachytherapy and hypofractionated EBRT with long-term ADT between 2003 and 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean dose to 90% of the planning target volume was 6.3 Gy/fraction of HDR brachytherapy. After five fractions of HDR treatment, EBRT with 10 fractions of 3 Gy was administered. All patients initially underwent ≥ 6 months of neoadjuvant ADT, and adjuvant ADT was continued for 36 months after EBRT. The median follow-up was 61 months (range, 25-94 months) from the start of radiotherapy. The 5-year biochemical non-evidence of disease, freedom from clinical failure and overall survival rates were 90.6% (HR, 97.8%; VHR, 81.9%), 95.2% (HR, 97.7%; VHR, 92.1%), and 96.9% (HR, 100%; VHR, 93.3%), respectively. The highest Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-defined late genitourinary toxicities were Grade 2 in 7.3% of patients and Grade 3 in 9.6%. The highest late gastrointestinal toxicities were Grade 2 in 2.8% of patients and Grade 3 in 0%. Although the 5-year outcome of this tri-modality approach seems favorable, further follow-up is necessary to validate clinical and survival advantages of this intensive approach compared with the standard EBRT approach.
27
Mack Roach, Gerald E. Hanks, Howard D. Thames et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2006 · 2.7K citations
Eric M. Horwitz, Kyounghwa Bae, Gerald E. Hanks et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2008 · 691 citations · Full text