American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2005 · 170 citations · 27 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyCancer ScreeningDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyCancer DetectionCancer Early DetectionComputed TomographyLung CancerPositron Emission TomographyTumor Detection18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission TomographyFluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission TomographyLung Cancer ScreeningLung Tumor ImagingNon-small Cell Lung Cancer ImagingPulmonary Nodule DiagnosisScreening Algorithm DevelopmentSmall Cell Lung Cancer Imaging
RATIONALE: Lung cancer screening using computed tomography (CT) is effective in detecting lung cancer in early stages. Concerns regarding false-positive rates and unnecessary invasive procedures have been raised. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficiency of a lung cancer protocol using spiral CT and F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). METHODS: High-risk individuals underwent screening with annual spiral CTs. Follow-up CTs were done for noncalcified nodules of 5 mm or greater, and FDG-PET was done for nodules 10 mm or larger or smaller (> 7 mm), growing nodules. RESULTS: A total of 911 individuals completed a baseline CT study and 424 had at least one annual follow-up study. Of the former, 14% had noncalcified nodules of 5 mm or larger, and 3.6% had nodules of 10 mm or larger. Eleven non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and one small cell lung cancer (SCLC) were diagnosed in the baseline study (prevalence rate, 1.32%), and two NSCLCs in the annual study (incidence rate, 0.47%). All NSCLCs (92% of prevalence cancers) were diagnosed in stage I (12 stage IA, 1 stage IB). FDG-PET was helpful for the correct diagnosis in 19 of 25 indeterminate nodules. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of malignancy were 69, 91, 90, and 71%, respectively. However, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of the screening algorithm, which included a 3-month follow-up CT for nodules with a negative FDG-PET, was 100%. CONCLUSION: A protocol for early lung cancer detection using spiral CT and FDG-PET is useful and may minimize unnecessary invasive procedures for benign lesions.
27
Ahmedin Jemal, Thomas S. Murray, Alicia Samuels et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2003 · 3.3K citations · Full text
Medicine, Demography, Oncology +17
Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening
Claudia I. Henschke, Dorothy I. McCauley, David F. Yankelevitz et al. · The Lancet · 1999 · 2.5K citations · Full text
Ahmedin Jemal, Limin X. Clegg, Elizabeth Ward et al. · Cancer · 2004 · 1.1K citations · Full text