American Journal of Agricultural Economics · 2005 · 283 citations · 36 references
ProductivityEconomicsRural EconomyResource EfficiencyApplied EconomicsEngineeringDevelopment EconomicsEconomic DevelopmentFarming SystemTobit ModelAgricultural EconomicsEfficiency AnalysisEconomic AnalysisBusinessAgrarian Political EconomyTechnical EfficiencyAgricultural EfficiencyAfrican Development
Farm household efficiency analysis captures off‑farm activities, unlike typical farm‑level studies. The study investigates the economic efficiency of farm households in The Gambia. The authors compute output‑based technical, allocative, and scale efficiency via nonparametric methods and analyze determinants with a Tobit model. Technical efficiency is high, scale inefficiency costs are modest, but most households suffer from allocative inefficiency driven by financial and nonfarm employment market imperfections.
Abstract This article investigates the economic efficiency of farm households, with an application to The Gambia. The efficiency analysis is conducted not at the farm level but at the household level, thus capturing the importance of off‐farm activities. Output‐based measures of technical, allocative, and scale efficiency are generated using nonparametric measurements. An econometric analysis of factors affecting the efficiency indexes is then conducted using a Tobit model. Technical efficiency is fairly high indicating that access to technology is not a severe constraint for most farm households. The cost of scale inefficiency is modest. Allocative inefficiency by contrast is found to be important for the majority of farm households. On the basis of the Tobit results, imperfections in markets for financial capital and nonfarm employment contribute to significant allocative inefficiency.
36
The Coefficient of Resource Utilization
Gérard Debreu · Econometrica · 1951 · 2.3K citations
Lawrence M. Seiford, Robert Thrall · Journal of Econometrics · 1990 · 1.9K citations
Efficiency Estimation of Production Functions
S. N. Afriat · International Economic Review · 1972 · 1.2K citations