Journal of Wildlife Management · 2010 · 10 citations · 18 references
MeasurementEducationAnthropometric IndicatorRoe DeerHuman-wildlife RelationshipOrthopaedic SurgeryAnimal StudyKinesiologyBody CompositionWildlife EcologyBiostatisticsFoot LengthPublic HealthConservation BiologyAnimal PhysiologyAnimal PerformanceHigh RepeatabilityBody SizeAnimal ScienceWildlife ManagementHind Foot LengthWildlife Biology
Abstract: We quantified the repeatability of >900 individual measures of hind foot length from 2 French populations of roe deer ( Capreolus capreolus ) monitored by capture‐recapture. We found a high repeatability (i.e., high intra‐class correlation, 0.76, 95% CI = 0.72–0.83 and 0.92, 95% CI = 0.91–0.95) in both populations. We also found that inexperienced observers reached a high level of intra‐ (1.00, 95% CI = 0.96–1.00) and inter‐observer repeatability (0.99, 95% CI = 0.98–1.00) when measuring hind foot length of harvested animals with a tool specifically designed for this task. Managers should pay particular attention to limit measurement errors because unreliable measurements require an increased sample size to assess individual variation and can mask biological patterns.
18
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team · 2000 · 352.8K citations · Full text