Why Some Anti-Immigrant Parties Fail and Others Succeed

Wouter van der Brug, Meindert Fennema, Jean Tillie

Comparative Political Studies · 2005 · 482 citations · 40 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Over the past two decades, anti‑immigrant parties have achieved substantial electoral support in some European countries such as Austria and Flanders, yet in others their success has been limited or short‑lived, and prevailing models focus mainly on demand‑side factors. The authors aim to explain aggregate‑level support for anti‑immigrant parties by developing a model that incorporates both demand and supply‑side factors. They empirically test this model on 13 European anti‑immigrant parties from 1989 to 1999, covering 25 party‑year observations and comparing a sociostructural model with their alternative approach. The sociostructural model accounts for only 3 % of the variance in success, whereas the authors’ model explains 83 %.

Abstract

Over the past 2 decades, some anti-immigrant parties have managed to gain substantial electoral support in various European countries, most notably, Austria ( Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs) and Flanders ( Vlaams Blok). However, in other countries, the success of such parties either has been insignificant or did not last. The most popular models of support for anti-immigrant parties focus primarily on the demand side of the electoral process. The authors develop a model to explain differences in aggregate-level support for these parties, which also takes into account the supply side. This model builds upon an explanation provided by Kitschelt. The model is tested empirically for 13 European anti-immigrant parties in the period from 1989 to 1999, altogether yielding 25 party-year combinations. The authors test the sociostructural model and their alternative model at the level of political parties. The sociostructural model explains 3% of the variance in success, whereas the authors’ model explains 83%.

References

40