2002 · 54 citations · 9 references
ComputingComputer SystemsComputer NetworksDigital CommunicationPhoneticsCommunication SystemsDigital Signal ProcessingSpeech PerceptionSpeech RecognitionSpeech Recognition TestingAdditive NoiseCepstral AnalysisCepstral CoefficientsLinear FilteringNoise RobustnessSpeech Pattern RecognitionSpeech Recognition AccuracySpeech Recognition Evaluation
We compare speech recognition accuracy for high-quality speech recorded under controlled conditions with speech as it appears over long-distance telephone lines. In addition to comparing recognition accuracy we use telephone-channel simulation to identify the sources of degradation of speech over telephone lines that have the greatest impact on speech recognition accuracy. We first compare the performance of the CMU SPHINX-I system on the TIMIT and NTIMIT databases. We found that other factors beyond a mere decrease in bandwidth cause the observed degradation in recognition accuracy, and that the environmental compensation algorithms RASTA and CDCN fail to compensate completely for degradations introduced by the telephone network. We identify the most problematic telephone-channel impairments using a commercial telephone channel simulator and the SPHINX-II system. Of the various effects considered, additive noise and linear filtering appear to have the greatest impact on recognition accuracy. Finally, we examined the performance of three cepstral compensation algorithms in the presence of the most damaging conditions. We found the compensation algorithms to be effective except for the worst 1% of the telephone channels.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
9
The SPHINX-II speech recognition system: an overview
Xuedong Huang, F. Alleva, Hsiao-Wuen Hon et al. · Computer Speech & Language · 1993 · 370 citations
M. B. Carey, H.-T. Chen, A. Descloux et al. · AT&T Bell Laboratories Technical Journal · 1984 · 51 citations