Publication | Closed Access
Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in human gastric and colonic carcinomas.
360
Citations
22
References
1988
Year
Epidermal Growth FactorEsophageal CancerImmunologyGastroenterologyPathologyCancer BiologyTumor BiologyColonic CarcinomasGastrointestinal OncologyCancer Cell BiologyFibroblast Growth FactorRadiation OncologyCancer ResearchEgf Receptor ExpressionMedicineColorectal CancerHuman GastricTumor MicroenvironmentGastric CarcinomaOncologyCancer Growth
The expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor was examined immunohistochemically in a total of 122 gastric and 61 colonic carcinomas, out of which 16 gastric and 8 colonic carcinomas were also examined by 125I-labeled EGF binding analysis and Western blotting. The values of EGF binding were 12.68 +/- 1.98 (SE; n = 16) fmol/mg protein in gastric carcinomas and 5.72 +/- 2.15 (n = 8) fmol/mg protein in nonneoplastic gastric mucosa, the difference being significant (P less than 0.01). In the colonic tissue, the binding capacities in carcinomas and nonneoplastic mucosa were 13.29 +/- 4.17 (n = 8) and 10.68 +/- 0.41 (n = 3) fmol/mg protein, respectively. Scatchard analysis of 125I-labeled EGF binding indicated a single class of receptors in gastric and colonic carcinomas with an apparent Kd value of from 111 to 277 (n = 4) and from 87.4 to 341 fM (n = 5), respectively, except for one gastric carcinoma having two classes of receptors (Kd = 15.9 and 896 fM). In Western blotting using monoclonal anti-EGF receptor antibody, various levels of EGF receptor expression were detected in 12 (85.7%) of the 14 gastric carcinomas and in 7 (87.5%) of the 8 colonic carcinomas. Immunohistochemically, EGF receptor immunoreactivity was detected in one (3.8%) of the 26 early gastric carcinomas, while it was observed in 33 (34.4%) of the 96 advanced gastric carcinomas, the incidence between the two being significantly different (P less than 0.01). In the colonic carcinomas, 47 (77.1%) of the 61 cases showed positive immunoreactivity to EGF receptor, which did not differ by histological type.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1