The Bone & Joint Journal · 2015 · 44 citations · 30 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryDiagnostic ImagingMetrologyOrthopedicsOrthopedic ExaminationRadiographic AssessmentAcetabular Component PositioningAcetabular VersionInstrument AccuracyInter-observer AgreementInter-observer ReliabilityInter-rater ReliabilityPostoperative RadiographsReference Standard Comparison
There is no single standardised method of measuring the orientation of the acetabular component on plain radiographs after total hip arthroplasty. We assessed the reliability and accuracy of three methods of assessing anteversion of the acetabular component for 551 THAs using the PolyWare software and the methods of Liaw et al, and of Woo and Morrey. All measurements of the three methods had excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability. The values of the PolyWare software, which determines version of the acetabular component by edge detection were regarded as the reference standard. Although the PolyWare software and the method of Liaw et al were similarly precise, the method of Woo and Morrey was significantly less accurate (p < 0.001). The method of Liaw et al seemed to be more accurate than that of Woo and Morrey when compared with the measurements using the PolyWare software. If the qualified lateral radiograph was selected, anteversion measured using the method of Woo and Morrey was considered to be relatively reliable.
30
Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.
G E Lewinnek, J L Lewis, R Tarr et al. · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 1978 · 2.8K citations
Dislocations After Total Hip-Replacement Arthroplasties
Paul A. Banaszkiewicz · 2013 · 2.1K citations
Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty.
Raymund Woo, B.F. Morrey · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 1982 · 1.2K citations