Contemporary Drug Problems · 1999 · 57 citations · 0 references
LawHealth LawDrug LawDrug OffensesSubstance Use PreventionCannabis OffensesCannabis RegulationDrug CrimeDrug EnforcementFederal Controlled Substance LawSubstance Abuse PreventionBureaucratic IndependenceBureaucratic InfluenceCannabis Enforcement PolicyCannabis PenaltiesCannabis Public Health RegulationCannabis Use Prevention
In 1913, California enacted cannabis prohibition—sponsored by the Board of Pharmacy as part of an anti‑narcotics campaign—despite minimal public concern or evidence of use, driven by a preemptive bureaucratic initiative rather than anti‑Mexican sentiment or “reefer madness.” The Board of Pharmacy conducted raids against marijuana in Los Angeles’s Mexican district in 1914 to enforce the new law. Even as penalties rose, marijuana use continued to spread throughout the 1920s and beyond.
Long before being banned by federal law in 1937, cannabis was prohibited by California in 1913. The law was sponsored by the state Board of Pharmacy as part of a wider, aggressive anti-narcotics campaign originally aimed at opiates. There was no broader public concern about cannabis at the time. Prior to 1913, evidence for the use of “hashish” in California is exceedingly slim. Mexican “marihuana” was not familiar to the public until after the law was passed. The law was originally proposed by board member Henry Finger, supposedly to prevent the spread of cannabis use by “Hindoo” immigrants. The board began staging raids against marihuana in the Mexican district of Los Angeles in 1914. Despite increasing penalties, use gradually spread during the 1920s and after. California's law was not caused by “reefer madness,” anti-Mexican prejudice, or any publicly perceived problem, but by a preemptive bureaucratic initiative.