Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management · 2011 · 105 citations · 16 references
Social SciencesUrban PlanningParticipatory PlanningSustainable DevelopmentUrban DevelopmentEnvironmental SustainabilitySustainability AssessmentUrban SustainabilitySocial Well-beingSustainability ObjectivesSustainable CitiesSustainable Urban DevelopmentUrban IndicatorsUrban Land-use MetabolismUrban Metabolic PlanningUrban Sustainability Assessment
Urban sustainability seeks to balance economic growth and social well‑being with natural resource protection, so indicators embedded in planning policies must address local context and measurable goals. The study aims to develop sustainability indicators that optimally assess planning alternatives affecting urban metabolism. The authors employed a participative methodology across five European cities, using Communities of Practice to co‑create the indicators. Engagement of researchers and practitioners through Communities of Practice bridged science and practice and enabled selection of consistent, meaningful indicators, but planning priorities can limit the scope and continuity of such collaborations.
In the urban context the quest to enhance economic growth and social well-being is challenged by the need to protect and manage natural resources. In order to promote sustainable urban planning, sustainability objectives are commonly embedded into planning policies, and the associated indicators used to evaluate planning interventions and monitor implementation of such objectives. The applicability of indicators is commonly tied in to their ability to address context-specific issues and monitor progress towards definite goals set at the local level. This paper presents the findings of a participative methodology applied in five European cities to develop a set of sustainability indicators with the aim of optimising their applicability for assessing planning alternatives affecting urban metabolism (i.e. the exchange of materials and energy within cities). The results indicate that engagement of researchers and practitioners through Communities of Practice (CoP) helped bridge the gap between science and practice, and facilitated the selection of consistent and meaningful indicators to be used as a tool for decision-making. However, the results also revealed that planning priorities can significantly shape the extent and scope of sustainability indicators, and that a CoP approach may not always be sufficient to guarantee continuity of collaboration.
16
Evan Fraser, Andrew J. Dougill, Warren Mabee et al. · Journal of Environmental Management · 2005 · 1.1K citations
Social Sciences, Environmental Management, Sustainability Management +17
The case for participation as tyranny
Bill Cooke, U Kothari · 2001 · 376 citations
Measuring urban sustainability
Marina Alberti · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · 1996 · 324 citations · Full text