Concepedia

TLDR

Deep Neural Networks excel on many tasks when large labeled data are available, yet they traditionally cannot map sequences to sequences. The authors propose a general end‑to‑end sequence‑to‑sequence learning framework that makes minimal assumptions about sequence structure. Their method encodes an input sequence into a fixed‑dimensional vector with a multilayered Long Short‑Term Memory network and decodes the target sequence with a second deep LSTM. On the WMT'14 English‑to‑French translation task, the LSTM achieved a BLEU score of 34.8—surpassing a phrase‑based SMT baseline of 33.3 and reaching 36.5 when reranking SMT hypotheses—while handling long sentences, learning robust phrase and sentence representations, and markedly improving performance when source words were reversed.

Abstract

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are powerful models that have achieved excellent performance on difficult learning tasks. Although DNNs work well whenever large labeled training sets are available, they cannot be used to map sequences to sequences. In this paper, we present a general end-to-end approach to sequence learning that makes minimal assumptions on the sequence structure. Our method uses a multilayered Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to map the input sequence to a vector of a fixed dimensionality, and then another deep LSTM to decode the target sequence from the vector. Our main result is that on an English to French translation task from the WMT'14 dataset, the translations produced by the LSTM achieve a BLEU score of 34.8 on the entire test set, where the LSTM's BLEU score was penalized on out-of-vocabulary words. Additionally, the LSTM did not have difficulty on long sentences. For comparison, a phrase-based SMT system achieves a BLEU score of 33.3 on the same dataset. When we used the LSTM to rerank the 1000 hypotheses produced by the aforementioned SMT system, its BLEU score increases to 36.5, which is close to the previous best result on this task. The LSTM also learned sensible phrase and sentence representations that are sensitive to word order and are relatively invariant to the active and the passive voice. Finally, we found that reversing the order of the words in all source sentences (but not target sentences) improved the LSTM's performance markedly, because doing so introduced many short term dependencies between the source and the target sentence which made the optimization problem easier.

References

YearCitations

Page 1