Residual Effects of Past on Later Behavior: Habituation and Reasoned Action Perspectives

TLDR

Behavioral frequency is often cited as evidence of habituation and as complementing reasoned models such as the theory of planned behavior. The article questions whether residual effects of past behavior on later behavior can be attributed to habituation. Past behavior predicts later behavior independently of intentions, but the habituation account fails for low‑opportunity behaviors in unstable contexts, lacks an independent habit measure, and empirical tests have been largely unsuccessful, and residual effects diminish when intentions are strong and well formed.

Abstract

The frequency with which a behavior has been performed in the past is found to account for variance in later behavior independent of intentions. This often taken as evidence for habituation of behavior and as complementing the reasoned mode of operation assumed by such models as the theory of planned behavior. In this article, I question the idea that the residual effect of past on later behavior can be attributed to habituation. The habituation perspective cannot account for residual effects in the prediction of low-opportunity behaviors performed in unstable contexts, no accepted independent measure of habit is available, and empirical tests of them habituation hypothesis have so far met with little success. A review of existing evidence suggests that the residual impact of past behavior is attenuated when measures of intention and behavior are compatible and vanishes when intentions are strong and well formed, expectations are implementation have been developed.