Publication | Closed Access
Ironies of State Building: A Comparative Perspective on the American State
144
Citations
88
References
2009
Year
NationalismState LawAmerican State BuildingLawStubborn RefusalBuilding DesignSocial SciencesBuilt EnvironmentState AuthorityAmerican IdentityComparative PerspectiveState FailureAmerican StateState StructureGovernment PolicyGeopoliticsAmerican PoliticsPublic PolicyUrban PolicyInternational RelationsUnited States ConstitutionInternational Relation TheoryComparative PoliticsState BuildingWorld PoliticsPolitical GeographyPolitical PluralismConstruction ManagementPolitical ScienceDomestic Politics
Comparativists and Americanists both examine state authority and propose similar answers, while recent scholarship retheorizes the state with a multidimensional view that links state building to society and offers comparative insights into welfare policy. The authors aim to retheorize the state with a multidimensional framework that revisits its international role and its paradoxical influence in American politics, challenging the assumption that the United States is stateless. The review finds that new intellectual trends in American and comparative state literature converge, providing a framework that revisits the state's international role and deepens understanding of its paradoxical influence in American political development.
This review of new directions in the American and comparative literatures on the state reveals important intellectual trends that parallel each other quite closely. Both comparativists and Americanists address similar questions about the sources of state authority, and both propose similar answers. Collectively, these scholars and others are retheorizing the state—developing a suppler, multidimensional picture of the state's origins, structure, and consequences—to shed light on the reasons for the state's stubborn refusal to cede the stage. The emerging understanding of the state that the authors describe provides a framework not only for revisiting the state in the international realm but also, in dialogue with recent Americanist studies, for revising and deepening the understanding of the state's paradoxical role in American political development and finally setting aside the assumption of the United States as stateless. In this emerging view, American state building, strength, and institutional capacity form through links with society, not necessarily through autonomy from society. But such distinctive patterns provide insights for comparative studies, too, for instance, in respect to the relationship between the state and welfare policy across nations.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1