Publication | Closed Access
Developing a Decision Instrument to Guide Computed Tomographic Imaging of Blunt Head Injury Patients
209
Citations
18
References
2005
Year
Computed‑tomographic head scans for blunt trauma are costly, delay care, expose patients to radiation, and detect intracranial injuries in only a minority of cases, yet clinical features may identify those who do not need imaging. Physicians evaluated blunt trauma patients for specific criteria, and recursive partitioning identified a set of features that predict intracranial injury with high sensitivity. Among 13,728 patients, 6.7% had intracranial injuries, but in patients under 65 without skull fracture, scalp hematoma, neurologic deficit, abnormal alertness or behavior, coagulopathy, or persistent vomiting, the criteria identified 98.3% of injuries while labeling 12.8% as low risk, demonstrating that clinical characteristics can reliably rule out the need for CT.
Background: Computed tomographic (CT) head scanning of blunt trauma patients is expensive, delays care, and necessitates radiation exposure, while detecting intracranial injuries in a minority of patients. Clinical characteristics may be able reliably identify patients who do not have intracranial injuries and consequently, do no require imaging. Methods: Physicians assessed blunt trauma patients undergoing imaging for the presence or absence of specific criteria. Recursive partitioning was used to identify criteria that predict intracranial injuries with high sensitivity. Results: Intracranial injuries were found in 917 of 13,728 enrolled patients (6.7%). Injuries were rare among patients under age 65 who had no evidence of skull fracture, scalp hematoma, neurologic deficit, abnormal alertness, abnormal behavior, coagulopathy, or persistent vomiting. These characteristics would have identified 901 injury cases (sensitivity 98.3% [CI: 97.2–99.0]), while classifying 1,752 patients (12.8%) as “low risk.” Conclusions: Clinical characteristics can reliably identify patients who are unlikely to have intracranial injuries and who do not require CT imaging.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1