Implementation Science · 2012 · 48 citations · 30 references
Public HealthChronic Disease PreventionHealth PromotionDisease PreventionHealth Services ResearchImplementation ScienceCommunity-based PreventionImplementation AssessmentImplementation OutcomesImplementation StrategiesOrganizational ReadinessPrevention StrategiesAdoption Readiness AssessmentIntervention Readiness AssessmentReadiness Assessment ModelsReadiness Assessment ScalesReadiness For Evidence-based PracticeReadiness For Policy AdoptionReadiness Measurement ScalesStage-based Readiness Assessment
BACKGROUND: There is a great deal of variation in the existing capacity of primary prevention programs and policies addressing chronic disease to deliver evidence-based interventions (EBIs). In order to develop and evaluate implementation strategies that are tailored to the appropriate level of capacity, there is a need for an easy-to-administer tool to stage organizational readiness for EBIs. METHODS: Based on theoretical frameworks, including Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations, we developed a survey instrument to measure four domains representing stages of readiness for EBI: awareness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. A separate scale representing organizational climate as a potential mediator of readiness for EBIs was also included in the survey. Twenty-three questions comprised the four domains, with four to nine items each, using a seven-point response scale. Representatives from obesity, asthma, diabetes, and tobacco prevention programs serving diverse populations in the United States were surveyed (N=243); test-retest reliability was assessed with 92 respondents. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test and refine readiness scales. Test-retest reliability of the readiness scales, as measured by intraclass correlation, ranged from 0.47-0.71. CFA found good fit for the five-item adoption and implementation scales and resulted in revisions of the awareness and maintenance scales. The awareness scale was split into two two-item scales, representing community and agency awareness. The maintenance scale was split into five- and four-item scales, representing infrastructural maintenance and evaluation maintenance, respectively. Internal reliability of scales (Cronbach's α) ranged from 0.66-0.78. The model for the final revised scales approached good fit, with most factor loadings >0.6 and all >0.4. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of adequate measurement tools hinders progress in dissemination and implementation research. These preliminary results help fill this gap by describing the reliability and measurement properties of a theory-based tool; the short, user-friendly instrument may be useful to researchers and practitioners seeking to assess organizational readiness for EBIs across a variety of chronic disease prevention programs and settings.
30
Missing data: Our view of the state of the art.
Joseph L. Schafer, J. A. Graham · Psychological Methods · 2002 · 10.9K citations
Actual Causes of Death in the United States
J. Michael McGinnis · JAMA · 1993 · 5.4K citations
Public Health, Health Sciences, Clinical Classification Systems +7