The affective underpinnings of soft power

Ty Solomon

European Journal of International Relations · 2014 · 138 citations · 53 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Soft power, introduced by Joseph Nye, is a key concept in International Relations that emphasizes intangible, non‑military dimensions of influence and has recently been reframed as a narrative and linguistic process. This article argues that soft power’s foundations lie in affective dynamics rather than solely in cultural or narrative attraction. The authors build on International Relations affect and aesthetics literature to conceptualize soft power as rooted in political emotion dynamics, introduce affective investment, and illustrate this with an analysis of American attraction in the war on terror. They find that soft power’s attraction derives not only from cultural influence or narrative construction but fundamentally from audiences’ affective investments in the identity images it produces.

Abstract

The concept of soft power occupies a prominent place in International Relations, foreign policy, and security studies. Primarily developed by Joseph S. Nye, the concept is typically drawn upon to emphasize the more intangible dimensions of power in a field long dominated by overtly material (i.e. military) power. Recently, some scholars have reframed soft power — specifically the key notion of attraction — as a narrative and linguistic process. This literature, however, has downplayed some of the other deep-seated underpinnings of soft power, which this article argues lie in the dynamics of affect. Building upon the International Relations affect and aesthetics literatures, this article develops the concept of soft power as rooted in the political dynamics of emotion and introduces the concept of affective investment. The attraction of soft power stems not only from its cultural influence or narrative construction, but more fundamentally from audiences’ affective investments in the images of identity that it produces. The empirical import of these ideas is offered in an analysis of the construction of American attraction in the war on terror.

References

53