GCB Bioenergy · 2012 · 1.7K citations · 169 references
AgricultureAgronomySoil SciencesNutrient CyclingSoil BiologySoil ScienceCarbon SequestrationPlant-soil InteractionsPlant-soil Nutrient InteractionsSoil Microbial BiomassSoil Nutrient CyclingSoil PhBelowground Biomass ResponseBiochar AmendmentsBiochar Carbon SequestrationBiochar Effects On Nutrient RetentionEcosystem Function ImpactsMicrobial Biomass ResponsesMicrobial Nutrient CyclingSoil Ph Effects On Nutrient Availability
Biochar, a carbon‑rich product of biomass pyrolysis, resists decomposition, sequesters carbon, and is promoted for boosting plant productivity and reducing nutrient leaching, yet its effects remain variable and its impact on downstream environments is unclear. The study conducts a meta‑analysis of 371 independent studies from 114 manuscripts to evaluate ecosystem responses to biochar application. The authors performed a meta‑analysis of 371 independent studies from 114 manuscripts. On average, biochar increased aboveground productivity, crop yield, soil microbial biomass, rhizobia nodulation, plant potassium, soil phosphorus, potassium, total nitrogen, total carbon, and soil pH, while showing no significant effect on belowground productivity, root colonization, plant nitrogen, or soil inorganic nitrogen, and its benefits were independent of application rate, indicating a promising win‑win‑win potential for energy, carbon storage, and ecosystem function.
Abstract Biochar is a carbon‐rich coproduct resulting from pyrolyzing biomass. When applied to the soil it resists decomposition, effectively sequestering the applied carbon and mitigating anthropogenic CO 2 emissions. Other promoted benefits of biochar application to soil include increased plant productivity and reduced nutrient leaching. However, the effects of biochar are variable and it remains unclear if recent enthusiasm can be justified. We evaluate ecosystem responses to biochar application with a meta‐analysis of 371 independent studies culled from 114 published manuscripts. We find that despite variability introduced by soil and climate, the addition of biochar to soils resulted, on average, in increased aboveground productivity, crop yield, soil microbial biomass, rhizobia nodulation, plant K tissue concentration, soil phosphorus (P), soil potassium (K), total soil nitrogen (N), and total soil carbon (C) compared with control conditions. Soil pH also tended to increase, becoming less acidic, following the addition of biochar. Variables that showed no significant mean response to biochar included belowground productivity, the ratio of aboveground : belowground biomass, mycorrhizal colonization of roots, plant tissue N, and soil P concentration, and soil inorganic N. Additional analyses found no detectable relationship between the amount of biochar added and aboveground productivity. Our results provide the first quantitative review of the effects of biochar on multiple ecosystem functions and the central tendencies suggest that biochar holds promise in being a win‐win‐win solution to energy, carbon storage, and ecosystem function. However, biochar's impacts on a fourth component, the downstream nontarget environments, remain unknown and present a critical research gap.
169
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Robert Rosenthal · Psychological Bulletin · 1979 · 8.6K citations
THE META-ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY
Larry V. Hedges, Jessica Gurevitch, Peter S. Curtis · Ecology · 1999 · 4.5K citations
Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change
Dominic Woolf, James E. Amonette, F. Alayne Street‐Perrott et al. · Nature Communications · 2010 · 2.6K citations · Full text