Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2002 · 257 citations · 15 references
MedicineNeuroscienceVisual NeuroscienceVisual PerceptionVisual PsychophysicsAction RecognitionMotion AnalysisMotion PerceptionMotion ProcessingVisual SystemApparent MotionBiological Motion PerceptionDorsal Visual StreamLocal Motion SignalsMotion Perception ImpairmentPerceptionVisual Motion ProcessingWalking
Biological motion perception, the ability to perceive a moving human figure from a few joint light points, is widely thought to rely on image motion signals. The study introduces a limited‑lifetime point‑light stimulus to test whether biological motion can be perceived without local image motion. The stimulus uses a limited‑lifetime technique that removes local image motion while preserving dynamic form cues. Subjects can recognize and discriminate walking direction and coherence in displays lacking local image motion, with performance comparable to classic point‑light displays, indicating that biological motion perception relies on dynamic form rather than image motion.
A vivid perception of the moving form of a human figure can be obtained from a few moving light points on the joints of the body. This is known as biological motion perception. It is commonly believed that the perception of biological motion rests on image motion signals. Curiously, however, some patients with lesions to motion processing areas of the dorsal stream are severely impaired in image motion perception but can easily perceive biological motion. Here we describe a biological motion stimulus based on a limited lifetime technique that tests the perception of a moving human figure in the absence of local image motion. We find that subjects can spontaneously recognize a moving human figure in displays without local image motion. Their performance is very similar to that for classic point-light displays. We also find that tasks involving the discrimination of walking direction or the coherence of a walking figure can be performed in the absence of image motion. Thus, although image motion may generally aid processes such as segmenting figure from background, we propose that it is not the basis for the percept of biological motion. Rather, we suggest biological motion is derived from dynamic form information on body posture evolving over time.
15
Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis
Gunnar Johansson · Perception & Psychophysics · 1973 · 4.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Biophysics, Neuroscience +14
Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion
Emily D. Grossman, Michael Donnelly, R. R. Price et al. · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · 2000 · 937 citations
Medicine, Neurobiology, Neuroscience +17
Adaptive filter model of the cerebellum
Masahiko Fujita · Biological Cybernetics · 1982 · 532 citations
Peter Neri, Maria Concetta Morrone, David C. Burr · Nature · 1998 · 342 citations