Proceedings of the IEEE · 1998 · 397 citations · 13 references
ComputingComputational EngineeringSurgeryBiomechanicsFinite Element AnalysisFinite Element MethodsBiomechanical ModelingComputational BiomechanicsShape DeformationSurgical VisualizationAnatomical Deformation ModelingDeformable ModelsDeformation ModelsFinite Element ModelingOrgan ModelingPhysical PropertiesReal-time Deformable Body SimulationSurgical Simulation
Modeling organ deformation for real‑time surgery simulation is difficult because tissue properties are poorly understood and conventional models cannot meet the 10–20 fps timing requirement, so recent work prioritizes speed and robustness over accuracy. This paper reviews emerging finite‑element techniques tailored for real‑time surgical simulation. It builds on the author’s fast finite‑element framework, evaluating its strengths and weaknesses relative to earlier models.
Modeling the deformation of human organs for surgery simulation systems has turned out to be quite a challenge. Not only is very little known about the physical properties of general human tissue but in addition, most conventional modeling techniques are not applicable because of the timing requirements of simulation systems. To produce a video-like visualization of a deforming organ, the deformation must be determined at rates of 10-20 times/s. In the fields of elasticity and related modeling paradigms, the main interest has been the development of accurate mathematical models. The speed of these models has been a secondary interest. But for surgery simulation systems, the priorities are reversed. The main interest is the speed and robustness of the models, and accuracy is of less concern. Recent years have seen the development of different practical modeling techniques that take into account the reversed priorities and can be used in practice for real-time modeling of deformable organs. The paper discusses some of these new techniques in the reference frame of finite element models. In particular, it builds on the recent work by the author on fast finite element models and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these models in comparison to previous models.
13
William H. Press, Saul A. Teukolsky, William T. Vetterling et al. · 1994 · 15.4K citations
The finite element method for engineers
Choice Reviews Online · 1995 · 1.7K citations
Engineering, Computational Engineering, Mechanical Engineering +17
A muscle model for animation three-dimensional facial expression
Keith Waters · 1987 · 742 citations · Full text
Architecture, Anatomy, 3D Modeling +16