Load‐bearing capacity of direct four unit provisional composite bridges with fibre reinforcement

Abstract

The aim of the current in vitro study was to evaluate the load-bearing capacity of provisional four-unit bridges with and without two different types of glass-fibre reinforcement produced in a direct technique with a silicon template from the composite materials Protemp, Luxatemp and CronMix. From each composite material, 30 bridges were manufactured, 10 without fibre reinforcement, 10 with Stick/StickNet and 10 with everStick/everStickNet reinforcement. After artificial aging by thermocycling samples were cemented onto a master model and subjected to load testing in a universal testing machine. Mean force at fracture for the groups without fibre reinforcement varied from 486 to 612 N. Depending on the material combination, fibre reinforcement resulted in a slightly increased or a reduced mean load-bearing capacity, varying from 674 N for the combination of Protemp and Stick to 262 N for CronMix and everStick. Position of fibres within the resin pontic was found to have an important influence on load-bearing capacity of reinforced bridges. Scanning electron microscopic investigation showed good adhesion of everStick fibres to the pre-impregnation resin whereas bonding of Stick fibres to the embedding polymer was incomplete. In conclusion, fibre reinforcement with Stick or everStick did not improve the load-bearing capacity of direct provisional bridges made from Protemp, Luxatemp, or CronMix as the position of fibres could not be controlled during the direct manufacturing process. To increase the load-bearing capacity of the provisional bridges, an exact positioning of fibres at the tension side in the dental laboratory is necessary.