2012 · 51 citations · 15 references
ComputingComputer ScienceHigh-performance ComputingParallel AlgorithmsParallel ComputingScientific ComputingGraphics Processing Unit ArchitectureGraphics Processing Unit ComputingGraphics Processing UnitsMatrix ComputationNumerical Linear AlgebraParallel ArchitecturesAdaptive Radar ProcessingDense Linear AlgebraGpu Performance ModelingMemory Hierarchy ModelingMemory Hierarchy PerformanceSpace-time Adaptive ProcessingSparse Linear AlgebraSparse Matrix Computation
We examine the problem of solving many thousands of small dense linear algebra factorizations simultaneously on Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). We are interested in problems ranging from several hundred of rows and columns to 4 x 4 matrices. Problems of this size are common, especially in signal processing. However, they have received very little attention from current numerical linear algebra libraries for GPUs, which have thus far focused only on very large problems found in traditional supercomputing applications and benchmarks. To solve small problems efficiently we tailor our implementation to the GPUs inverted memory hierarchy and multi-level parallelism hierarchy. We provide a model of the GPU memory subsystem that can accurately predict and explain the performance of our approach across different problem sizes. As a motivating example, we look at space-time adaptive radar processing, a real-time application that requires hundreds of independent QR factorizations of small complex matrices (e.g. 240 × 66). For realistic matrix sizes from a standard radar processing benchmark, our implementation on an NVIDIA Quadro 6000 GPU runs 2.8 × to 25 × faster than Intel's Math Kernel Library (MKL) on an Intel Core i7-2600. For the QR factorizations of 5,000 56 × 56 single-precision matrices, our approach runs 29 × faster than MKL and 140 × faster than the state-of-the-art linear algebra library for GPUs. In each of these cases we are using the GPU's hardwareaccelerated division and square root functions that are accurate up to 22 mantissa bits.
15
Samuel Williams, Andrew Waterman, David A. Patterson · Communications of the ACM · 2009 · 2.4K citations · Full text
A set of level 3 basic linear algebra subprograms
Jack Dongarra, Jeremy Du Croz, Sven Hammarling et al. · ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · 1990 · 1.8K citations · Full text
LogP: towards a realistic model of parallel computation
David Culler, Richard M. Karp, David A. Patterson et al. · 1993 · 1.5K citations
John Nickolls, William J. Dally · IEEE Micro · 2010 · 958 citations
Benchmarking GPUs to tune dense linear algebra
В. М. Волков, James Demmel · 2008 · 726 citations