IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2013 · 31 citations · 23 references
ComputingComputer ScienceAlgorithmsCryptographyDigital CommunicationChannel CodingCoding TheoryCommunication ComplexityError Control CodingError-correcting CodesComplexityImplementation ComplexityLdpc CodesLow-density Parity-check CodesMinimum DistanceMinimum Distance BoundsQuasi-cyclic CodesUpper Bounds
Recent work by Divsalar <etal xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/> has shown that properly designed protograph-based low-density parity-check codes typically have minimum (Hamming) distance linearly increasing with block length. This fact rests on ensemble arguments over all possible expansions of the base protograph. However, when implementation complexity is considered, the expansions are frequently selected from a smaller class of structured expansions. For example, protograph expansion by cyclically shifting connections generates a quasi-cyclic (QC) code. Other recent work by Smarandache and Vontobel has provided upper bounds on the minimum distance of QC codes. In this paper, we generalize these bounds to punctured QC codes and then show how to tighten these for certain classes of codes. We then evaluate these upper bounds for the family of protograph codes known as AR4JA codes that have been recommended for use in deep space communications in a standard established by the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. At block lengths larger than 4400 bits, these upper bounds fall well below the ensemble lower bounds.
23
Low-density parity-check codes
Robert G. Gallager · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 1962 · 10.6K citations · Full text
J. J. Stiffler · 1971 · 1.4K citations