Synthesis, characterization and structural transformation of a discrete tetragonal metalloprism

Jing‐Yun Wu, Ming‐Shiou Zhong, Ming‐Hsi Chiang, Meng‐Rong Tsai, Long‐Li Lai

Dalton Transactions · 2011 · 19 citations · 89 references

Concepts

Abstract

A novel M(2)L(4) tetragonal metalloprism, [(NO(3)(-))⊂{Cu(2)(μ-Hdpma)(4)}(NO(3))(2)](NO(3))(5) (1), was prepared from the self-assembly reaction of Cu(NO(3))(2)·3H(2)O and flexible clip-like organic ligand di(3-pyridylmethyl)amine (dpma) under acidic conditions. The cationic prismatic hollow structure of 1 hosts one nitrate anion via both metal-ligand dative bonds and electrostatic interactions. Metalloprism 1 can dissolve in water and its prismatic structure remains intact as supported by ESI-MS data. When metalloprism 1 was treated with sodium thiocyanate and sodium azide in aqueous solutions, two polymeric coordination architectures, [Cu(μ-Hdpma)(2)(NCS)(2)](NO(3))(2) (2) and [Cu(μ-dpma)(2)(μ-1,1-N(3))(μ-1,3-N(3))] (3), formed at room temperature, respectively. Polymer 2 has a two-dimensional sheet structure showing a simple rhombic 4(4)-sql topology in network connectivity, whereas polymer 3 gives a three-dimensional uninodal pcu net. The conformation of the flexible ditopic ligand is varied from a trans-trans-syn conformer in 1 to a trans-trans-anti conformer in 2 and to a trans-gauche-anti conformer in 3. The observations imply the occurrence of structural transformation from a discrete metalloprism into polymeric coordination architectures via a decoordination/rearrangement process. Magnetic studies of metalloprism 1 suggest that the two Cu(II) centers are weakly antiferromagnetically coupled. The spins communicate via the nitrate template while the Cu···O(nitrate) interactions are weak. For polymer 3, a ferromagnetically coupled system (J(2) = +17.6 cm(-1)) is operative between two Cu(II) centers bridged by end-on azidos and an antiferromagnetic coupling (J(1) = -7.7 cm(-1)) between two Cu(II) centers with end-to-end azidos. In contrast to relatively large coupling values of the reported examples, the weak ferromagnetic interaction results from insufficient spin delocalization between two Cu(II) centers.

References

89