Publication | Closed Access
Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition
6.4K
Citations
5
References
1978
Year
EngineeringMachine LearningOptimum Dynamic ProgxammingBiometricsSpoken Language ProcessingAlgorithm OptimizationSpeech RecognitionPattern RecognitionComputational LinguisticsRobust Speech RecognitionLanguage StudiesTime-normalization AlgorithmComputer ScienceSpeech CommunicationSpeech TechnologySlope ConstraintSpeech ProcessingSpeech InputSpeech PerceptionLinguisticsSpeaker Recognition
The study proposes an optimal dynamic‑programming time‑normalization algorithm for spoken word recognition. The authors develop a dynamic‑programming framework that defines symmetric and asymmetric distance measures, introduces a slope‑constraint to enhance word discrimination, optimizes this constraint through experiments, and benchmarks the resulting algorithm against existing DP methods. Experiments show the symmetric‑form algorithm outperforms others, achieving error rates no higher than two‑thirds of those of the best conventional DP algorithms.
This paper reports on an optimum dynamic progxamming (DP) based time-normalization algorithm for spoken word recognition. First, a general principle of time-normalization is given using time-warping function. Then, two time-normalized distance definitions, called symmetric and asymmetric forms, are derived from the principle. These two forms are compared with each other through theoretical discussions and experimental studies. The symmetric form algorithm superiority is established. A new technique, called slope constraint, is successfully introduced, in which the warping function slope is restricted so as to improve discrimination between words in different categories. The effective slope constraint characteristic is qualitatively analyzed, and the optimum slope constraint condition is determined through experiments. The optimized algorithm is then extensively subjected to experimental comparison with various DP-algorithms, previously applied to spoken word recognition by different research groups. The experiment shows that the present algorithm gives no more than about two-thirds errors, even compared to the best conventional algorithm.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1