Publication | Closed Access
A cross-sectional study of muscle strength and mass in 45- to 78-yr-old men and women
1K
Citations
31
References
1991
Year
The study examined how muscle strength relates to age and body composition in healthy adults aged 45–78 years. Isokinetic dynamometry assessed elbow and knee strength at multiple speeds, while fat‑free and muscle mass were estimated via hydrostatic weighing and urinary creatinine. Older adults had lower fat‑free and muscle mass and reduced strength, but when strength was normalized to mass the age effect largely disappeared, indicating muscle mass is the main driver of age‑ and gender‑related strength differences across upper and lower limbs.
The isokinetic strength of the elbow and knee extensors and flexors was measured in 200 healthy 45- to 78-yr-old men and women to examine the relationship between muscle strength, age, and body composition. Peak torque was measured at 60 and 240 degrees/s in the knee and at 60 and 180 degrees/s in the elbow by use of a Cybex II isokinetic dynamometer. Fat-free mass (FFM) was estimated by hydrostatic weighing in all subjects, and muscle mass (MM) was determined in 141 subjects from urinary creatinine excretion. FFM and MM were significantly lower (P less than 0.001) in the oldest group. Strength of all muscle groups at both testing speeds was significantly (P less than 0.006) lower (range 15.5–26.7%) in the 65- to 78- than in the 45- to 54-yr-old men and women. When strength was adjusted for FFM or MM, the age-related differences were not significant in all muscle groups except the knee extensors tested at 240 degrees/s. Absolute strength of the women ranged from 42.2 to 62.8% that of men. When strength was expressed per kilogram of MM, these gender differences were smaller and/or not present. These data suggest that MM is a major determinant of the age- and gender-related differences in skeletal muscle strength. Furthermore, this finding is, to a large extent, independent of muscle location (upper vs. lower extremities) and function (extension vs. flexion).
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1