Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2004 · 47 citations · 10 references
EngineeringCivil EngineeringConstruction EngineeringPavement EngineeringStructural EngineeringPavement ConstructionPavement DesignPavement Failure MechanismsPavement Performance AnalysisPavement RehabilitationPavement Structural AnalysisConcrete StrengthJoint FaultingJointed Plain Concrete PavementLoad Transfer EfficiencyMechanistic-empirical AnalysisMechanistic-empirical DesignMechanistic-empirical Pavement DesignRigid Pavement Design
A summary is presented of the procedures used to model the effects of transverse joint faulting in the design of jointed plain concrete pavements in the 2002 Design Guide, which was developed under NCHRP Project 1-37A, Development of the 2002 Guide for Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. The mechanistic-empirical 2002 guide procedure for rigid pavement design incorporates several key features that are expected to offer significant improvements in design accuracy. The 2002 Design Guide faulting model identifies the differential energy of subgrade deformation as the mechanistic parameter governing joint faulting development. This parameter reflects total pavement flexibility and the level of load transfer efficiency. The 2002 design procedure uses the incremental damage approach. It allows for direct consideration of changes in many factors throughout the entire design period and joint load transfer, including material properties (concrete strength and modulus), seasonal climatic conditions, traffic loadings, subgrade support, and others. Each analysis increment represents a specific combination of the preceding factors over a distinct period (month, season, etc.). The main concepts are described, the model overview presented, and the results of the model calibration provided. Several examples illustrating sensitivity of the 2002 Design Guide faulting prediction to the key design parameters (dowel diameter, slab width and edge support, built-in temperature gradient, and others) are also provided.
10
Lev Khazanovich, Olga Selezneva, H. Thomas Yu et al. · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2001 · 43 citations
COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD AND POORLY PERFORMING PCC PAVEMENTS
Lev Khazanovich, M I Darter, R. J. V. Bartlett et al. · 1998 · 42 citations
PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE PAVEMENTS. VOLUME III: IMPROVING CONCRETE PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE
H. Thomas Yu, Kurt Smith, M I Darter et al. · 1998 · 39 citations
SENSITIVITY ANALYSES FOR SELECTED PAVEMENT DISTRESSES
Amy L. Simpson, J B Rauhut, P R Jordahl et al. · 1994 · 24 citations
Engineering, Construction Management, Condition Assessment +16