Journal of Applied Physiology · 2015 · 84 citations · 26 references
EducationKinesiologyPhysiologyExercise PhysiologyMetabolic RegulationPhysical ActivityAerobic ExerciseDiabetes MellitusMetabolic Adaptation To ExerciseMetabolic Responses To ExercisePhysical FitnessResistance TrainingAerobic Training AdaptationExercise Training AdaptationExercise-induced Insulin SensitivityInsulin ActionInsulin Sensitivity After ExerciseInsulin Sensitivity IndicesMetabolic Adaptation To TrainingWeight Management Through Exercise
Most health organizations recommend a combination of aerobic training (AT) and resistance training (RT), yet few studies have compared their acute (within 24 h of the last exercise bout) and sustained (after 14 days of no exercise training) effects alone and in combination on glucose metabolism. The present study (Studies Targeting Risk Reduction Interventions through Defined Exercise-Aerobic Training and/or Resistance Training) compared the effects of AT, RT, and the combination (AT/RT) on insulin action at both acute and sustained phases. Subjects (N = 196) were 18-70 yr old (mean age = 50 yr), overweight (mean body mass index = 30 kg/m2), sedentary with moderate dyslipidemia, and were randomized into one of three 8-mo exercise groups: 1) RT: 3 days/wk, 8 exercises, 3 sets/exercise, 8-12 repetitions/set; 2) AT: equivalent to ∼19.2 km/wk (12 miles/wk) at 75% peak O2 consumption; 3) AT/RT: the combination of AT and RT. One hundred forty-four subjects completed the intervention. Eighty-eight subjects completed all pre- and postintervention testing visits. Insulin sensitivity, glucose effectiveness, and disposition index were measured via a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test with subsequent minimal model analyses. AT/RT resulted in greater improvements in insulin sensitivity, β-cell function (disposition index), and glucose effectiveness than either AT or RT alone (all P < 0.05). Approximately 52% of the improvement in insulin sensitivity by AT/RT was retained 14 days after the last exercise training bout. Neither AT or RT led to acute or chronic improvement in sensitivity index. In summary, only AT/RT (which required twice as much time as either alone) led to significant acute and sustained benefits in insulin sensitivity
26
Carol Ewing Garber, Bryan Blissmer, Michael R. Deschenes et al. · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2011 · 9.1K citations · Full text
Exercise Standards for Testing and Training
Gerald F. Fletcher, Philip A. Ades, Paul Kligfield et al. · Circulation · 2013 · 2.2K citations · Full text
Effects of the Amount and Intensity of Exercise on Plasma Lipoproteins
William E. Kraus, Joseph A. Houmard, Brian D. Duscha et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2002 · 1.6K citations
Education, Kinesiology, Physiology +14
Physical Activity/Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes
Ronald J. Sigal, Glen P. Kenny, David H. Wasserman et al. · Diabetes Care · 2006 · 952 citations · Full text