Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling · 2009 · 29 citations · 12 references
Social SciencesCriminologyGeographyBayesian Data AnalysisCrimeSpatial StatisticsBayesian Model BuildingBayesian Spatial AnalysisBayesian StatisticsCriminal ProfilingGeographic ProfilingSpatial Statistical ModelingAge Group ClassificationBayesian Geographic ProfilingBayesian Risk AnalysisBayesian Risk EstimationMinimum DistancePlace-based Crime AnalysisProduct Measures
Abstract This study tested the Bayesian journey‐to‐crime (JTC) model by gender and age for serial offenders from Manchester, England. The data were 4056 crimes committed by 171 serial offenders between 2003 and 2006. The data were subdivided by gender and age group to examine whether accuracy and precision varied by these subgroups. In general, the centre of minimum distance was found to be the most accurate measure, but the Bayesian risk and product measures were found to be the most precise measurements. The traditional ‘distance decay’ type of JTC function did not produce estimates that are as accurate nor as precise as the Bayesian approach. Tests were conducted on whether specific gender and age group JTC functions and origin–destination matrices improved predictability. With the exception of juvenile male offenders, the general functions were more accurate and precise. In terms of building an accurate and precise geographical profiling methodology, the results point to the need to include information on the likely predisposition of neighbourhoods to produce offenders as well as information on the crime opportunities available to offenders. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
12
On the Complexity and Accuracy of Geographic Profiling Strategies
Brent Snook, Michele Zito, Craig Bennell et al. · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · 2005 · 109 citations