Reducing the Run-Time Complexity of Multiobjective EAs: The NSGA-II and Other Algorithms

Mikkel T. Jensen

IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · 2003 · 456 citations · 22 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary computation has seen a surge of research, with many algorithms employing Pareto-based fitness that leads to O(GMN²) run times, motivating a need to reduce the N² factor for large populations. The study proposes a new efficient nondominated sorting algorithm to accelerate multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. The algorithm is integrated into NSGA‑II, lowering its run‑time complexity to O(GN log^(M‑1)/N) from the previous O(GMN²). Experiments confirm the improved algorithm is substantially faster than the original, and that dominance‑based MOEAs can be markedly accelerated by efficient algorithms. © 2002.

Abstract

The last decade has seen a surge of research activity on multiobjective optimization using evolutionary computation and a number of well performing algorithms have been published. The majority of these algorithms use fitness assignment based on Pareto-domination: Nondominated sorting, dominance counting, or identification of the nondominated solutions. The success of these algorithms indicates that this type of fitness is suitable for multiobjective problems, but so far the use of Pareto-based fitness has lead to program run times in O(GMN/sup 2/), where G is the number of generations, M is the number of objectives, and N is the population size. The N/sup 2/ factor should be reduced if possible, since it leads to long processing times for large population sizes. This paper presents a new and efficient algorithm for nondominated sorting, which can speed up the processing time of some multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) substantially. The new algorithm is incorporated into the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) and reduces the overall run-time complexity of this algorithm to O(GN log/sup M-1/N), much faster than the O(GMN/sup 2/) complexity published by Deb et al. (2002). Experiments demonstrate that the improved version of the algorithm is indeed much faster than the previous one. The paper also points out that multiobjective EAs using fitness based on dominance counting and identification of nondominated solutions can be improved significantly in terms of running time by using efficient algorithms known from computer science instead of inefficient O(MN/sup 2/) algorithms.

References

22