The American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2002 · 408 citations · 23 references
MedicineOncologyPathologyDiagnostic ImagingGastrointestinal OncologyUltrasonographyBiopsy TechniquesCancer DetectionCancer DiagnosisGastrointestinal EndoscopyPancreatic CancerTumor DetectionEndoscopic Ultrasound-guided BiopsyEndoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle AspirationEndoscopic Ultrasound-guided FnaGastrointestinal MalignancyImage-guided Fine-needle AspirationNeedle Aspiration BiopsyPancreatic BiopsyPancreatic Cancer Detection
OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis of pancreatic tumors can be problematic. This study aimed to determine the performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS FNA) in pancreatic malignancy when prior biopsies performed by CT guidance or ERCP were negative. METHODS: A total of 185 patients with known or suspected pancreatic masses were prospectively evaluated with EUS FNA. Before EUS FNA, all patients were evaluated with abdominal CT (61 with CT-guided biopsy) and 91 with ERCP (41 had brushings or biopsy). RESULTS: EUS had greater sensitivity than CT in detecting a mass (99% vs 57%, p < 0.0001). In 58 patients with negative CT-guided biopsies, EUS FNA had 90% sensitivity for malignancy, 50% specificity for benign disease and 84% accuracy. Similarly, in 36 patients with negative ERCP tissue sampling, results for EUS FNA were 94%, 67% and 92%, respectively. Complications were mild and infrequent (0.5%). CONCLUSION: EUS FNA of pancreatic masses safely and accurately diagnoses pancreatic malignancy when prior biopsy techniques have been unsuccessful.
23
Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience
David Williams, A. V. Sahai, Lars Aabakken et al. · Gut · 1999 · 631 citations · Full text
Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT, and MR imaging.
Matthias Müller, Christa Meyenberger, P Bertschinger et al. · Radiology · 1994 · 501 citations