Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair

144

Citations

49

References

2009

Year

TLDR

DNA double‑strand breaks are repaired by gene conversion when both ends have homology, but by break‑induced replication when only one end is homologous. The study seeks to determine how the homology status of DSB ends is assessed and what factors dictate the choice between gene conversion and break‑induced replication. A recombination execution checkpoint (REC), involving the RecQ helicase Sgs1, evaluates the relative position and orientation of homologous sequences before DNA synthesis to decide the repair pathway. REC activity, mediated by Sgs1, governs pathway choice; Pol32 is required only for gap repair, revealing that break repair and gap repair are distinct kinetically and genetically.

Abstract

A DNA double-strand break (DSB) is repaired by gene conversion (GC) if both ends of the DSB share homology with an intact DNA sequence. However, if homology is limited to only one of the DSB ends, repair occurs by break-induced replication (BIR). It is not known how the homology status of the DSB ends is first assessed and what other parameters govern the choice between these repair pathways. Our data suggest that a “recombination execution checkpoint” (REC) regulates the choice of the homologous recombination pathway employed to repair a given DSB. This choice is made prior to the initiation of DNA synthesis, and is dependent on the relative position and orientation of the homologous sequences used for repair. The RecQ family helicase Sgs1 plays a key role in regulating the choice of the recombination pathway. Surprisingly, break repair and gap repair are fundamentally different processes, both kinetically and genetically, as Pol32 is required only for gap repair. We propose that the REC may have evolved to preserve genome integrity by promoting conservative repair, especially when a DSB occurs within a repeated sequence.

References

YearCitations

Page 1