Publication | Open Access
Balancing fertility management and economics in organic field vegetable rotations
10
Citations
1
References
2007
Year
EngineeringApplied EconomicsLand UseCropping SystemAgricultural EconomicsAgricultural ProductionSustainable AgricultureSustainable Crop ProductionFertility ManagementField‐scale VegetablesCrop RotationSoil Nutrient ManagementPublic HealthAgricultural ProductivitySoil FertilitySuch RotationsCrop ManagementOrganic Field‐scale VegetablesVegetable ProductionOrganic FarmingNatural Resource ManagementFarming SystemsNatural Resource EconomicsNutrient Management
Abstract BACKGROUND: Organic field‐scale vegetables are among the most profitable enterprises in organic farming systems. They are also some of the most nutrient‐demanding crops, and many organic arable systems with field‐scale vegetables are stockless. Without livestock manure inputs, nutrient supply depends on fertility‐building crops, which generate only costs and no income. Different strategies of fertility management were compared on a central England research farm. Fertility management treatments consisted of different lengths of fertility building with green waste compost additions. Outputs and inputs in terms of nutrients and economics were monitored for 31 rotations during 1996–2002. RESULTS: N, P and K rotational nutrient balances, as well as C inputs, showed a negative relationship with rotational gross margins. Variable and allocated fixed costs of fertility building were low, between 2 and 5% of variable costs (£0.5–2 ha −1 for 1 kg N ha −1 supplied to the rotation). The intensity of vegetable cropping in these rotations was moderate (25–40% vegetable crops in the rotation) and balancing of fertility management and economics was possible at this intensity without livestock manure or other permitted fertiliser additions. CONCLUSION: Completely stockless systems (in analogy may be called vegan) are possible in organic vegetable production without compromising on fertility or economics. However, for a higher vegetable‐cropping intensity (up to 90%) a more sophisticated mix of short‐term fertility‐building and N‐trapping crops will be needed and such rotations may require further external addition of green waste or livestock manure. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1