Are Attractive People Rewarding? Sex Differences in the Neural Substrates of Facial Attractiveness

Jasmin Cloutier, Todd F. Heatherton, Paul J. Whalen, William M. Kelley

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · 2008 · 285 citations · 93 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Facial attractiveness judgments are thought to involve reward‑related brain regions, yet their precise neural substrates remain unclear. The study tested whether reward‑related brain regions exhibit greater activation when men view attractive women compared to when women view attractive men. An event‑related fMRI experiment was performed in which participants rated opposite‑sex faces for attractiveness, and these ratings guided analyses of brain regions responsive to attractive faces. Reward circuitry, including nucleus accumbens and orbitofrontal cortex, showed a linear increase in activation with attractiveness, but orbitofrontal cortex differentiated attractive from unattractive faces only in male participants.

Abstract

Abstract The current study examined the neural substrates of facial attractiveness judgments. Based on the extant behavioral literature, it was hypothesized that brain regions involved in identifying the potential reward value of a stimulus would be more active when men viewed attractive women than when women viewed attractive men. To test this hypothesis, we conducted an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment during which participants provided explicit attractiveness judgments for faces of the opposite sex. These individual ratings were subsequently used to perform analyses aimed at identifying the brain regions preferentially responsive to attractive faces for both sex groups. The results revealed that brain regions comprising the putative reward circuitry (e.g., nucleus accumbens [NAcc], orbito-frontal cortex [OFC]) showed a linear increase in activation with increased judgments of attractiveness. However, further analysis also revealed sex differences in the recruitment of OFC, which distinguished attractive and unattractive faces only for male participants.

References

93