Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Socioeconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities

1K

Citations

56

References

2007

Year

TLDR

Socioeconomic status is linked to differences in childhood cognitive achievement. The study investigates whether SES effects on neurocognitive development form a gradient rather than a categorical split, examines which cognitive systems vary with SES, tests if language mediates SES differences, and explores how prefrontal/executive subsystems change across SES. The authors assessed 150 first‑graders from diverse SES backgrounds on language, visuospatial, memory, working memory, cognitive control, and reward‑processing tasks. SES accounted for over 30 % of variance in language ability and a smaller yet significant portion of variance in most other cognitive domains, with mediating factors and potential interventions discussed.

Abstract

Abstract Socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with childhood cognitive achievement. In previous research we found that this association shows neural specificity; specifically we found that groups of low and middle SES children differed disproportionately in perisylvian/language and prefrontal/executive abilities relative to other neurocognitive abilities. Here we address several new questions: To what extent does this disparity between groups reflect a gradient of SES‐related individual differences in neurocognitive development, as opposed to a more categorical difference? What other neurocognitive systems differ across individuals as a function of SES? Does linguistic ability mediate SES differences in other systems? And how do specific prefrontal/executive subsystems vary with SES? One hundred and fifty healthy, socioeconomically diverse first‐graders were administered tasks tapping language, visuospatial skills, memory, working memory, cognitive control, and reward processing. SES explained over 30% of the variance in language, and a smaller but highly significant portion of the variance in most other systems. Statistically mediating factors and possible interventional approaches are discussed.

References

YearCitations

Page 1