Linguistic Inquiry · 2003 · 207 citations · 17 references
Language StudiesLinguisticsPragmaticsSeparation Of PowersSyntaxAgreement MorphologyAgreement SystemsCase MarkingCase MorphologyGrammarSyntactic AnalysisAgreement TheoryEmbedded ClausesGrammatical AgreementSubject AgreementSubject-verb Agreement VariationVerb-subject Order
Agree(X, Subj) accounts for all agreement in West Germanic: complementizer agreement (CA) results from an Agree relation between uninterpretable φ-features of Fin 0 (Rizzi 1997) and φ-features of the subject; subject-verb agreement (SA) spells out uninterpretable φ-features of T 0 on V 0 raised to T 0 , even in OV clauses (Haegeman 2000). Although DPs need Case to participate in Agree relations (Chomsky 2000), deletion-marked Case remains syntactically accessible until the next strong phase (Pesetsky and Torrego 2001), allowing CA and SA to cooccur. In Frisian, ‘that’ cannot agree in embedded VO clauses because it is in Force; the verb is in Fin 0 , bearing CA (contra Zwart 1997).
17
Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection
Michael Halle, Alec Marantz · 1993 · 2.4K citations
Michael A. Covington · Language · 1994 · 1.6K citations
From Old French to the theory of pro-drop
Marianne Adams · Natural Language & Linguistic Theory · 1987 · 347 citations
Josef Bayer · The Linguistic Review · 1984 · 303 citations · Full text